Compare the2025 Nissan AltimaVS 2025 Chevrolet Malibu

For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Nissan Altima have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Chevrolet Malibu doesn’t offer pretensioners for its rear seat belts.

For enhanced safety, the front seat shoulder belts of the Nissan Altima are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Chevrolet Malibu doesn’t offer height-adjustable seat belts.

Over 200 people are killed each year when backed over by motor vehicles. The Altima has standard Rear Automatic Braking that use rear sensors to monitor for objects to the rear and automatically apply the brakes to prevent a collision. The Malibu doesn’t offer backup collision prevention brakes.

The Altima AWD offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Malibu doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.

The Altima SL has a standard Intelligent Around View Monitor to allow the driver to see objects all around the vehicle on a screen. The Malibu only offers a rear monitor and rear parking sensors that beep or flash a light. That doesn’t help with obstacles to the front or sides.

The Altima has a standard blind spot warning system that uses sensors to alert the driver to objects in the vehicle’s blind spots where the side view mirrors don’t reveal them. A system to reveal vehicles in the Malibu’s blind spot costs extra.

To help make backing out of a parking space safer, the Altima has standard Rear Cross Traffic Alert, helping the driver avoid collisions. Chevrolet charges extra for Rear Cross Traffic Alert on the Malibu.

The Altima’s driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Malibu doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.

Both the Altima and the Malibu have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front wheel drive, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems and rearview cameras.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Nissan Altima is safer than the Chevrolet Malibu:

	Altima	Malibu
	Driver
STARS	5 Stars	5 Stars
HIC	171	172
Leg Forces (l/r)	114/342 lbs.	252/306 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Nissan Altima is safer than the Chevrolet Malibu:

	Altima	Malibu
OVERALL STARS	5 Stars	4 Stars
	Front Seat
STARS	4 Stars	4 Stars
Abdominal Force	164 lbs.	232 lbs.
	Rear Seat
STARS	5 Stars	3 Stars
HIC	185	365
Spine Acceleration	46 G’s	62 G’s
Hip Force	544 lbs.	1117 lbs.
	Into Pole
STARS	5 Stars	5 Stars
HIC	157	279

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Altima, with its five-star roll-over rating, is 1.1% less likely to roll over than the Malibu, which received a four-star rating.

The Altima’s corrosion warranty is unlimited miles longer than the Malibu’s (unlimited vs. 100,000 miles).

Nissan pays for scheduled maintenance on the Altima for 2 years and 24,000 miles. Nissan will pay for oil changes, tire rotations, air filter replacements, cabin filter replacement, brake fluid replacement, inspections, and any other required maintenance (up to 3 visits). Chevrolet only pays for the first scheduled maintenance visit on the Malibu.

A reliable vehicle saves its owner time, money and trouble. Nobody wants to be stranded or have to be without a vehicle while it’s being repaired. Consumer Reports rates the Altima’s reliability 21 points higher than the Malibu.

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Altima second among midsize cars in their 2024 Initial Quality Study. The Malibu was rated third.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2024 Auto Issue reports that Nissan vehicles are more reliable than Chevrolet vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Nissan 3 places higher in reliability than Chevrolet.

The Altima AWD’s standard 2.5 DOHC 4-cylinder produces 19 more horsepower (182 vs. 163) than the Malibu’s 1.5 turbo 4-cylinder. The Altima’s standard 2.5 DOHC 4-cylinder produces 25 more horsepower (188 vs. 163) than the Malibu’s 1.5 turbo 4-cylinder.

As tested in Car and Driver the Altima AWD is faster than the Chevrolet Malibu:

	Altima	Malibu
Zero to 60 MPH	7.4 sec	8 sec
Zero to 100 MPH	19.7 sec	24.7 sec
5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start	8.3 sec	8.9 sec
Passing 30 to 50 MPH	4.8 sec	4.9 sec
Passing 50 to 70 MPH	5.6 sec	5.9 sec
Quarter Mile	15.8 sec	16.4 sec
Speed in 1/4 Mile	91 MPH	85 MPH

On the EPA test cycle the Altima S/SV FWD gets better fuel mileage than the Malibu (27 city/39 hwy vs. 28 city/36 hwy).

The Altima has a standard locking fuel door. The fuel filler door is not lockable on the Malibu. A locking fuel door helps prevent fuel theft and vandalism, such as sugar in the tank.

The Altima stops much shorter than the Malibu:

	Altima	Malibu
70 to 0 MPH	164 feet	171 feet	Car and Driver
60 to 0 MPH	115 feet	127 feet	Motor Trend
60 to 0 MPH (Wet)	140 feet	149 feet	Consumer Reports

For better traction, the Altima has larger standard tires than the Malibu (215/60R16 vs. 205/65R16).

The Altima S’ standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Malibu LS’ standard 65 series tires.

The Altima has a standard easy tire fill system. When inflating the tires, the vehicle’s integrated tire pressure sensors keep track of the pressure as the tires fill and tell the driver when the tires are inflated to the proper pressure. The Malibu doesn’t offer vehicle monitored tire inflation.

The Altima has vehicle speed sensitive variable-assist power steering, for low-effort parking, better control at highway speeds and during hard cornering, and a better feel of the road. The Malibu doesn’t offer variable-assist power steering.

The Altima SR handles at .90 G’s, while the Malibu LT pulls only .84 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

The Altima executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.1 seconds quicker than the Malibu LT (26.3 seconds @ .68 average G’s vs. 27.4 seconds @ .63 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Altima S’ turning circle is 1 foot tighter than the Malibu’s (36 feet vs. 37 feet).

The Altima has 2.3 inches more front legroom, .6 inches more front hip room and 1.1 inches more rear hip room than the Malibu.

A low lift-over trunk design makes loading and unloading the Altima easier. The Altima’s trunk lift-over height is 26.9 inches, while the Malibu’s liftover is 30.5 inches.

The Altima’s driver’s power window opens or closes with one touch of the window control, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths. The Malibu’s standard driver’s power window switch has to be held the entire time to close it fully.

If the windows are left open on the Altima the driver can close them all at the outside door handle. The driver of the Malibu can only close the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

The Altima’s speed-sensitive wipers speed up when the vehicle does, so that the driver doesn’t have to continually adjust the speed of the wipers. The Malibu’s manually variable intermittent wipers have to be constantly adjusted.

The Altima’s LED headlights produce a whiter, brighter light (up to 3x) using five times less power than the Malibu’s standard projector halogen headlights and light instantly. LED lights also last over twenty times longer than halogen.

Insurance will cost less for the Altima owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the Altima with a number “1” insurance rate while the Malibu is rated higher at a number “3” rate.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Altima is less expensive to operate than the Malibu because typical repairs cost much less on the Altima than the Malibu, including $234 less for a water pump, $260 less for a muffler, $73 less for front brake pads, $42 less for a starter, $2 less for fuel injection, $14 less for a fuel pump and $10 less for front struts.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Nissan Altima, based on reliability, safety and performance. The Chevrolet Malibu isn't recommended.