Suburban Nissan of Farmington Hills
37901 Grand River Ave
Farmington Hills, MI 48335
947-254-0078

Compare the2026 Nissan ZVS 2026 Ford Mustang

2026 Nissan Z
2026 Ford Mustang

Safety

The Z has standard Active Head Restraints, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Active Head Restraints system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Mustang doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.

The Z has standard Front and Rear Sonar System to help warn the driver about vehicles, pedestrians or other obstacles behind or in front of their vehicle. The Mustang doesn’t offer a front parking aid.

Both the Z and the Mustang have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

Reliability

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2025 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Nissan vehicles are better in initial quality than Ford vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Nissan second in initial quality, above the industry average. With 24 more problems per 100 vehicles, Ford is ranked 13th, below the industry average.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ March 2025 Auto Issue reports that Nissan vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Nissan 1 place higher in reliability than Ford.

Engine

As tested in Car and Driver the Nissan Z 3.0 is faster than the Mustang EcoBoost 2.3 turbo 4-cylinder (automatics tested):

Z

Mustang

Zero to 60 MPH

4.3 sec

4.5 sec

Quarter Mile

12.7 sec

13.2 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

115 MPH

103 MPH

As tested in Car and Driver the Z NISMO is faster than the Mustang Dark Horse 5.0 DOHC V8 (automatics tested):

Z

Mustang

Zero to 60 MPH

3.9 sec

4.3 sec

Fuel Economy and Range

On the EPA test cycle the Z gets better mileage than the Mustang Fastback:

MPG

Z

Manual

3.0 turbo V6

18 city/24 hwy

Auto

3.0 turbo V6

19 city/28 hwy

NISMO 3.0 turbo V6

17 city/24 hwy

Mustang Fastback

Manual

GT 5.0 V8

15 city/23 hwy

Dark Horse 5.0 V8

14 city/22 hwy

Auto

5.0 V8

16 city/24 hwy

Dark Horse 5.0 V8

14 city/22 hwy

The Z has a standard locking fuel door which locks and unlocks with the power locks. The fuel filler door is not lockable on the Mustang. A locking fuel door helps prevent fuel theft and vandalism, such as sugar in the tank.

Brakes and Stopping

The Z’s brakes have 12% more swept area (the area covered by the brake pads) than the Mustang EcoBoost (603 vs. 538.7 square inches), so the Z has more braking power available.

The Z stops shorter than the Mustang:

Z

Mustang

100 to 0 MPH

305 feet

312 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

121 feet

129 feet

Consumer Reports

60 to 0 MPH (Wet)

135 feet

144 feet

Consumer Reports

Tires and Wheels

For better traction, the Z has larger standard tires than the Mustang (245/45R18 vs. 235/50R18).

The Z Sport’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 45 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Mustang’s standard 50 series tires.

The Z has a standard easy tire fill system. When inflating the tires, the vehicle’s integrated tire pressure sensors keep track of the pressure as the tires fill and tell the driver when the tires are inflated to the proper pressure. The Mustang doesn’t offer vehicle monitored tire inflation.

Suspension and Handling

The Z NISMO handles at 1.02 G’s, while the Mustang EcoBoost Fastback pulls only .95 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Z NISMO executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1 seconds quicker than the Mustang EcoBoost Premium Fastback (23.9 seconds @ .83 average G’s vs. 24.9 seconds @ .75 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Z’s turning circle is 3.7 feet tighter than the Mustang’s (32.8 feet vs. 36.5 feet). The Z’s turning circle is 5 feet tighter than the Mustang GT/Dark Horse’s (32.8 feet vs. 37.8 feet).

Chassis

The Z is 1 foot, 5 inches shorter than the Mustang, making the Z easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

Towing

The Z Manual can be flat towed on all four wheels (dinghy towed), allowing recreational vehicle owners to bring it with them on the road. When they reach their destination, the Z can be unhitched and driven around locally. The Mustang can’t be towed flat on the ground.

Ergonomics

The Z’s standard power windows have a locking feature to keep children from operating them. Ford does not offer a locking feature on the Mustang’s standard power windows.

Compared to the Ford Mustang, the Nissan Z eliminates the need for separate garage door openers and associated risks of losing, breaking, or having dead batteries with its optional integrated Homelink® universal remote controlled from the rear view mirror.

Compared to traditional radio, the Nissan Z’s standard SiriusXM satellite radio provides an unmatched listening experience. Its extensive coverage guarantees consistent, crystal-clear reception across the continental U.S., and access to over 100 channels dedicated to a multitude of genres, including music, news, sports, talk shows, and comedy, many with only limited commercial breaks. Satellite radio costs extra on the Mustang.

Recommendations

Consumer Reports® recommends both the Nissan Z and the Ford Mustang, based on reliability, safety and performance.

Suburban Nissan of Farmington Hills | 37901 Grand River Ave Farmington Hills, MI 48335 | 947-254-0078

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia